|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
Alternative investments
should be found in any portfolio, but when
it comes to hedge funds, the tricky question
is: at what percentage?
The importance of hedge funds in a portfolio
can be reflected by the continued inflows
into hedge funds as seen in 2004, when they
attracted $73.6 billion in net inflows, and
expanded by slightly more than 18 per cent
to $972.6 billion in assets under management.
A research paper from Greenwich Associates
noted that 32 per cent of European institutional
investors now use hedge funds, an increase
from 23 per cent in 2003. In addition to this,
these usage and growth rates have been broadly
mirrored in the US and Japan.
One reason for the upsurge of interest in
hedge funds is because of its historically
superior risk-adjusted returns compared to
traditional asset classes. This idea is set
out in the table below which shows that hedge
funds (as measured by the CSFB/Tremont Hedge
Fund Index) outperformed equities and bonds,
as well as cash, over an 11-year period with
a lower risk profile, in the case of equities.
Fig. 1 Annual average US$ returns (Jan 1994
Dec 2004)
| |
Return per cent
p.a. |
Volatility per cent
p.a. |
| All Hedge Funds Index |
11.0 |
8.2 |
| Global Equities |
6.1 |
14.2 |
| Global Equities |
7.1 |
6.6 |
| Global Equities |
4.0 |
0.5 |
CSFB/Tremont Hedge Fund Index
has been used as a proxy for hedge funds.
Returns are net of all fees
MSCI World has been used as a proxy for equities
Citigroup World Government Bond Index has
been used as a proxy for global bonds
US$ LIBOR 3 Month Index has been used as a
proxy for cash
Source: CSFB/Tremont, MSCI, Citigroup and
Schroders
Coupled with the historically strong performance,
the need for portfolio diversification and
protection when markets turn downward has
also fuelled growth.
When conducting asset allocation, it has to
be recognised that the return behaviour of
many hedge funds makes them appear as a separate
asset class due to the fact that hedge fund
returns tend to be non-normally distributed
and may exhibit significant skewness as well
as substantial kurtosis. However, if hedge
funds are treated as a separate class, then
traditional asset allocation models are likely
to over allocate to them.
Depending on the type and investors
risk factors, the investment is estimated
to be from five to 25 per cent. Also, look
at how the addition of hedge funds could complement
other holdings in a portfolio.
With the addition of hedge funds, a portfolio
can achieve the same level of return with
a lower level of risk, or a higher level of
return with the same level of risk. For a
highly equity weighted portfolio, the addition
of hedge funds tends to reduce risk rather
than increase return, thus improving diversification.
Some individual hedge funds have restrictive
minimum investment requirements that prevent
diversification. Also, access can pose a problem
as top performing hedge funds may be closed
to new monies. Many investors have been entering
the hedge fund arena via the fund of hedge
funds route.
Unfortunately there is no neat number that
an investment manager can utilise to add a
hedge fund element to their portfolio. Use
a tailored approach as each portfolio is considered
on an individual basis together with its risk
appetite. An investor can then embark on assessing
the kind of hedge fund strategies it needs
to achieve the desired risk/return profile.
* HFR 2004 Industry Reports. Data as at 31
December 2004.
This article was contributed by Schroders
Investment Management. |
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|